The Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller, a titan of the watch world, boasts impressive specifications, but one frequently discussed aspect is its case thickness. This substantial dimension contributes significantly to its rugged durability and water resistance, but it also impacts its wearability. Understanding this crucial feature is essential for anyone considering purchasing this iconic timepiece. This article will explore the case thickness of different Deepsea Sea-Dweller models, comparing them to other Rolex divers and examining their implications for comfort and overall appeal. We'll also delve into the wider context of the watch, touching upon its investment potential and exploring reviews of various models.
Rolex Deepsea 116660 vs 126660: A Thickness Comparison
The most significant difference between the Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller 116660 and the 126660 lies in their movements and, consequently, their slight variations in case thickness. While both are substantial watches, the newer 126660 typically boasts a slightly thicker case due to the inclusion of the updated Caliber 3235 movement. This movement, introduced by Rolex in recent years, is more technologically advanced and offers improved performance and power reserve. However, the difference is subtle, often measured in fractions of a millimeter, and may not be immediately noticeable to the average wearer. The precise measurements can vary depending on the source, but generally, the 116660 is slightly slimmer. This difference, however minor, contributes to the ongoing discussion amongst collectors and enthusiasts about which model offers a superior balance of robustness and wearability.
My personal experience with a Speedmaster Professional (42mm and 14mm thick) provides a useful point of comparison. While both are substantial watches, the Deepsea's increased thickness is noticeable. This is due not only to the increased water resistance capabilities but also to the robust construction necessary to withstand the extreme pressures at significant depths. The Speedmaster, designed for space exploration, prioritizes functionality and legibility, while the Deepsea prioritizes extreme depth capabilities. This difference in design philosophy directly impacts the case thickness.
Rolex Deepsea: A Good Investment?
The Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller, particularly the discontinued models like the 116660, has consistently proven to be a strong investment. The brand's reputation for quality, its limited production numbers, and its enduring popularity among collectors all contribute to its value appreciation. However, the investment potential is not guaranteed and depends on several factors, including market conditions and the specific model's condition and rarity. The newer 126660, while also a strong performer, may not appreciate as rapidly as the older models due to its more recent release. The long-term value of any luxury watch is impacted by broader economic trends and the overall health of the luxury watch market. Therefore, while the Deepsea is generally considered a sound investment, it's crucial to approach it with a long-term perspective and an understanding of the inherent risks associated with any investment.
Rolex Deepsea 136660 Review (Hypothetical, as this model doesn't exist)
There is no Rolex Deepsea model with the reference number 136660. This likely stems from a misunderstanding or a typographical error. The existing models, the 116660 and 126660, are the primary focus of discussions regarding the Deepsea. Any review referencing a 136660 would be completely fabricated.
current url：https://fosdfq.lennondeathclue.com/news/rolex-deepsea-sea-dweller-case-thickness-89092